On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:05 -0700, Brian Harring wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > I completely understand this. However, in most cases the reason the > > older packages are still in the tree is because *somebody* doesn't have > > it stable yet. > > Strictly stable, or unstable?
I guess in this case, we would want both, so we can tell who's where. > What about profiles, which to account for? Stable (keyword) doesn't > mean visible (profile p.mask or global p.mask), scan 'em all? I wouldn't scan anything that isn't "stable" or "dev" in profiles.desc, at all. By the way, thanks for this information. Things like this really do help us clean up the tree and it is appreciated, even if my tone doesn't always come across that way. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
