Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:37:47 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Molle Bestefich wrote: > | > I noticed that several users have commented with a relevant > | > complaint: GCC-4.x is required by the ebuild, but no information is > | > ever conveyed to the end user about this fact. The ebuild does not > | > have a dependency on GCC-4.x. > | > | No, it's not. gcc-3.4.x *is* required. That versions (or later) is > | *stable* everywhere where xine-lib is stable. > > Not true. According to the 2006.0 x86 profile, for example, you're > required to have ">=sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1". There is no requirement > that 3.4 be installed. >
Yeah, that's not what I've been talking about at all, what's your point? I was saying that gcc-3.4 and better is stable everywhere where it's needed. How does it change that 3.3 is dead as a nail in a lamproom door and users should switch to something that we actually can support? -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
