Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
>> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> c is simpler. I like it.
>> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to 
>> <herd> tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer is listed.
> Actually, this isn't that simple at the moment. There are packages that
> directly list me as the maintainer, but I want bugs for them assigned to
> the herd by default - so that the other folk in the herd can find them
> quickly.
> Perhaps this could be alleviated with an explicit assign-to field in
> package metadata? At the same time, it should have an explicit cc-to
> field, for cases where the maintainer is not in the herd.

Well, that reminds me - just stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or whatever else) to
maintainer field then and put it first, enough of a hint for me :)



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to