On Monday 10 July 2006 10:08, Jakub Moc wrote: > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: > >> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote: > >>> c is simpler. I like it. > >> > >> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of > >> stopping to <herd> tag and assigning to that even when a particular > >> maintainer is listed. > > > > Actually, this isn't that simple at the moment. There are packages that > > directly list me as the maintainer, but I want bugs for them assigned to > > the herd by default - so that the other folk in the herd can find them > > quickly. > > > > Perhaps this could be alleviated with an explicit assign-to field in > > package metadata? At the same time, it should have an explicit cc-to > > field, for cases where the maintainer is not in the herd. > > Well, that reminds me - just stick [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or whatever else) to > maintainer field then and put it first, enough of a hint for me :)
Should we then use this metadata-file (maintainer before herd tag): <!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd";> <pkgmetadata> <maintainer> <email>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</email> <name>Gentoo VDR Project</name> </maintainer> <herd>media-tv</herd> </pkgmetadata> Matthias -- Matthias Schwarzott Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org
pgprl0Gwn2pR4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
