On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 18:29 -0400, Thomas Cort wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:58:46 +0200 > "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's not about trust, it's about knowing what the CFLAGS/FEATURES > > were. That way if someone else reports a failure, you can compare the > > reports and see what differences might be triggering the fault. > > I get that posting `emerge --info` provides a "known good" set of > CFLAGS/USE-flags/FEATURES/toolchain versions/etc which can be useful at > times. However, we don't require that developers post their emerge > --info when a package works, so why do we require that ATs do it?
Honestly, it might be sufficient to only post 'emerge --info' when it *doesn't* work. If we need corroboration from someone where it did work, we can ask. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
