On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:14 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> For the record, I was waiting for those folks to come to us to resolve
> it. Last I knew we had a partial resolution with the parties involved,
> but shortly after that they just stopped pursing it. I figured if it
> was
> that important to them, they'd get back with us. So I'm not sure what
> happened to that exactly. If they weren't pursing it anymore, I didn't
> see the point in us pursing it since they were the ones requesting
> it.
It is important, and still on my todo list. I'm still awaiting the
anon-cvs/svn/whatever to be finished before taking on the next part. Not
trying to reopen the whole can of worms at them moment, but.. As for
partial resolution, the discussion degenerated to having those saying it
would cause classes of devs vs those saying they aren't devs and
shouldn't have @g.o addresses from what I remember. I'll have to go
re-read the thread to be sure.
--
Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
