Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 06 November 2006 16:59, Jakub Moc wrote: > >> Chris Gianelloni napsal(a): >> >>>> And WONTFIXed in 15 minutes. In that case, I'd like to resubmit it to >>>> the council... :/ >>>> >>> So because you didn't like the answer from the people responsible for >>> this, you'd rather go over their heads and try to bring this up to the >>> council, so we can override their decisions? Not bloody likely. >>> >> No. Not because I didn't like the answer - because I haven't seen a >> *single* argument *in favour* of using the IMHO completely broken SPF >> thing. >> > > so what are you looking for ? us to regurgitate the entire SPF argument over > again ? > > infra believes using SPF helps fight spam, you guys believe SPF does not ... > how do you expect to come to a conclusion over such a technology ? > -mike > Where the hell is a valid argument in favor of infra pov? I re-stated my case in comment #14. All I received was "I disagree"!
And now the council do the same thing?!?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
