Mike Frysinger napsal(a): > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 03:40, Jakub Moc wrote: > if you're categorizing those as "commercial broken stuff" you might want to > look up the word "commercial"
Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably started this whole debate) [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-user-de&m=115148403700916&w=2 The gcl borkage is your job [2] and you might want to finally revert your broken commit: [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-lisp/gcl/gcl-2.6.7-r2.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
