Mike Frysinger napsal(a): > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 09:34, Jakub Moc wrote: >> Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably >> started this whole debate) > > so you're replying to a non-gentoo-dev thread on a gentoo-dev thread when the > threads arent even closely related ? how does that make sense ? > > this thread has nothing to do with commercial packages
No, it does not. And RESTRICT=sandbox is still completely unneeded, commercial packages or not... We don't need to introduce a special RESTRICT because of two borked packages in the tree and we should not introduce any more packages borked in a similar way into the tree. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
