On 2007/03/25, Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Precisely. "NOTABUG" sounds less harsh than "INVALID" (for some > just a little, for others a lot), it is less likely to irk people, > and it is also used elsewhere, so why not use it instead? >
Not that i care that much, but imho INVALID is more accurate in some cases. For instance, if one reports about app/foo being broken but happens to have ricer CFLAGS in his "emerge info", his report will be closed as INVALID... which is exactly what it is: an invalid report, because not made in sane conditions. This resolution usualy comes with a note which tell to reopen if the bug still happen after app/foo has been recompiled with sane CFLAGS. The possibity that there is a real bug in app/foo is left open. At the contrary, NOTABUG sounds to me like a definitive answer. -- TGL. -- [email protected] mailing list
