On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 14:53 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > Correct, because the only way Ciaran can prove beyond doubt that his Paludis > is a viable option is to see hundreds, nay millions, of people using it. I'm > quite sure that he won't achieve that goal by bleating in here as frequently > as he is currently.
That's uncalled for. There's no need to get nasty.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
