On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:37:37 +0200 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erm, not really? This is about proper usage of GLEP42 stuff.
Yes, it is about proper usage of GLEP 42. This news item is one example of that. > There's nothing critical about your * stuff. Sure there is. If users aren't informed about the change in an appropriate manner, the users get annoyed. You're trying to sabotage this based upon arguments over wording technicalities. Where is your evidence that this is not delivering what is best for affected users? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
