Am Samstag 05 Mai 2007 22:44 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:37:37 +0200 > > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Erm, not really? This is about proper usage of GLEP42 stuff. > > Yes, it is about proper usage of GLEP 42. This news item is one example > of that. > > > There's nothing critical about your * stuff. > > Sure there is. If users aren't informed about the change in an > appropriate manner, the users get annoyed. > > You're trying to sabotage this based upon arguments over wording > technicalities. Where is your evidence that this is not delivering > what is best for affected users?
A may be his evidence, as I am a user, and do not thing it is worth a news item. It wont block paludis from working and if you change it, so that it does you have caused the problem yourself because config file changes should not be abrupt, but it is good to have a "buffer" version which sends warnings to the user if he didnt fix his config. I bet there are other users around, who think a config file format change that doesnt break anything but produce warnings in the first place is non-critical. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
