Wulf C. Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the conversation with you, Matti, he argues that elog is 
> not "prominent" enough, users don't read USE flag descriptions, etc.
> So those issues seem unresolved.

Well, this arguments are nothing new, just read this ml..
However, i don't think think his reasoning is justified here. We do
inform the user, everything else is not within our reach. And imho the
license doesn't require more.
If i get a cease and desist over *that*, well, screw it.
-- 
Regards, Matti Bickel
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred

Attachment: pgp4MSlQKyGCY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to