On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:07 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 19:52 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > New-style virtuals are just *packages*, or did I get this completely > > wrong? So how is this situation different from two packages with the > > same name, but in different categories? > > It isn't different. That's the problem. If you have two packages with > the same name, you have the same problem.
On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename. app-vim/ant It's quite annoying when one needs the real ANT ( dev-java/ant ), not the vim menu plugin so vi can invoke ant or etc. IMHO app-vim/ant should really be app-vim/vim-ant or something other than just ant. Personal pet peeve of some time now, just lacked the occasion to mention it till now ;) -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
