* Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Torsten Veller schrieb: > > Let me please point out that no infrastructure team member is > > on the list right now. > > > > As infra is often involved in implementing council decisions we should > > take care that the information flows. IMHO the easiest way to achieve this > > is electing an infra member to the council. > > In the contrary. We should see that not too much power/responsibility is > concentrated on a single person. > > Since... > a) This guarantees that the council comes to a decision which is not > influenced by the (direct and already known) interest of it's members > and > b) Reduces the risk for Gentoo when someone with more than one key > position leaves
If devs in a key position leave, it's often a problem. But I don't see a concentration problem here. > And if someone has to be in a council/whatsoever to get the relevant > information, something else is broken. I didn't write that and didn't meant that. > And tweaking the election procedure to reach that someone from a > special project is elected is somehow questionable, don't you think? No. I also vote this way. I want the council to represent Gentoo as a whole and be represented by Gentoo as a whole. I think it helps the other council members too if there is e.g. an infra member to take care of the infra stance. But: A council without an infra member can do a good job too. Thanks. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
