On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:06:46 +0100 Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One thing that would need to be decided: > > > > LICENSE="GPL-2" > > > > Would that require an = prefix? To simplify things, we could say > > that *only* the postfix [] form counts for licenses... > > To have backwards compatability...yes.
Backwards compatibility isn't necessary over an EAPI bump. The question is whether it's sufficiently useful that having inconsistent parsing rules for dep specs and license specs is acceptable. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
