On 12/12/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 15:49 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > gnupg-2 is drop-in replacement of gnupg-1, so eventually no slotting > > should be used. > > Drop in according to YOU, which I have taken issue with since 1/1/07. > Per last upstream release, and every one since 2.x was release, just as > I have quoted and stated many times before. > > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2007q3/000259.html > > "GnuPG-2 has a different architecture than GnuPG-1 (e.g. 1.4.6) in that > it splits up functionality into several modules. However, both > versions may be installed alongside without any conflict. In fact, > the gpg version from GnuPG-1 is able to make use of the gpg-agent as > included in GnuPG-2 and allows for seamless passphrase caching. The > advantage of GnuPG-1 is its smaller size and the lack of dependency on > other modules at run and build time. We will keep maintaining GnuPG-1 > versions because they are very useful for small systems and for server > based applications requiring only OpenPGP support."
As I told you before, I wont slot these two. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
