On 12/12/07, Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With no slotting I can bet on GnuPG-1 going away shortly after all > architectures have stabled GnuPG-2,
gpg-1.X series will be available as long as upstream maintain it. > or is that not so and such users can > mask >=GnuPG-1.9 and keep using a smaller version that perfectly fits > their needs? If yes, why not slot it as is designed? Slotting makes logic if there is some advantage of having both slots installed at the same machine, as gnupg-2 does all gnupg-1 does, there is no point in slotting, forcing users to mess with eselect in order to resolve the dependency of other packages with gnupg. You can always mask >=gnupg-2 if you want the 1.X series on embedded devices. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
