On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:23:11 -0500 (EST) "Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Most of the time, when people are moaning about 'slacker' archs, > > they don't have any kind of decent technical reason for doing so... > > In cases where such a reason exists, the arch teams are usually > > quite happy to prioritise if asked. > > And the point of me asking for the council to talk about this is to > set some kind of guidelines for what happens after you've asked X > number of times and let Y number of days go by, where X and Y are > amounts open for discussion.
X and Y are pretty much irrelevant. The important factor is Z, the impact of leaving things the way they are. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
