On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 09:12 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:08:47 +0100 > "Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. What he meant and doesn't dare to say is you didn't ask, but > > demanded, in your usual dry and pesky "I'm a spoiled 6-year old" tone. > > And this as usual results in people ignoring you. People aren't as > > stupid as you think they are, and they don't want to play this game > > with you anymore. So don't build a case on the fact that you're not > > getting answers. > > > > Someday you'll understand this. > > > > Oh, and council members too aren't as stupid as you think they are. If > > they decide to discuss this, one of their first steps will surely be > > to try and evaluate what the current situation is. If I were a council > > member I'd probably feel offended by such condescension from your > > part. > > Ah, so this is what you consider to be solid technical reasoning, is > it? You certainly present a compelling case, but probably not for > the position you were trying to... >
This kind of conversation is not technical at all... Ciaranm, are you a MIPS user? If so, do you think that running KEYWORDS="mips" is less likely to result in breakage than running KEYWORDS="~mips"?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
