On 1/8/08, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:38:07 -0800 > Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the > > > correct way to fix a repoman message is to start nuking arch > > > keywords, ignoring what it does to the rest of the tree. > > > > ...for the architecture in question which is proving incapable of > > keeping up with the state of the tree as it is... > > > > Sorry, you fail. > > Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying that > packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because no-one's > maintaining them?
Of course they do -- [email protected] mailing list
