Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:49:38 +0100 Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:26:19 +0100 "Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:No, we didn't because the whole thing is p.masked for a reason. It, KDE 4.0.1, is broken crap that should not yet be re-keyworded.OK then. and I am not going to cross-post this to -dev@, btw: why the hell did you decide to put broken crap in the tree? It should never have left your repository, it seems.The follow-up question, by the way, is even better, or it's answer should be: if the description of KDE teams keyword dropping policy on bug #209418 is anything to go by, the keywords for x86 and amd64 should have been dropped as well, or testing passed miraculously for these arches despite KDE 4.0.1 being broken crap.
These would be the architectures they have access to and are using to do the development work on these ebuilds, getting them to the point where ready for evaluation by those on other architectures. Just like when you add a new ebuild, you add it with the keywords for architectures you personally have verified to work.
-- fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
