On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2008 03:57:16 -0700 > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:03:45AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Requested attendees > > > =================== > > > > > > PMS: ciaranm, pkgcore dev, portage dev, any other tools that care > > > about versions > > > > Might I suggest that if PMS is going to be discussed, a copy of > > PMS.pdf actually be available somewhere? Preferably with the > > kdebuild-1 crap stripped out... > > Might I suggest that you read the agenda rather than going completely > off topic like last time?
If PMS is going to be discussed in some form, it's a fair request that folks have an easily readable version. Insane enough, loosening the 8 digit version restriction can have other implications- very least, verifying that bash 3.0 is when [[ ]] support was introduced since [ ] breaks down for long long from a quick look. That's off the top of the head- could be more. Actually having a pdf to read would make that a helluva lot easier too. Course, it's way more fun to just bitch at me then build a pdf so others can look at the current spec for the discussion at hand (bugs are one thing, looking at the actual spec is another). One thing I wouldn't mind the council discussing is whether or not the recent behaviour re: pms on -dev is acceptable for running a project- it's not exactly engendering cooperation. Feel free to delay that till the next month, or ignore it (y'alls court after all). ~brian
pgp8vwbQ9jdqt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
