On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:23:39PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2008 04:15:10 -0700 > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If PMS is going to be discussed in some form, it's a fair request > > that folks have an easily readable version. > > The relevant sentence was provided. Had you bothered to read the > agenda, you would know this.
Council: if you wouldn't mind and have time, kindly extend the discussion of PMS beyond version components (which I already clarified where the potential issue is) to the future of it, current behaviour from (frankly) the sole developer of it, how involved other package managers (say... portage, the biggest out there) are in the process. It's frankly a discussion long overdue. Cheers. ~harring
pgpFCYxppuMZ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
