On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Arun Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > We were just discussing if it makes sense to either die or issue a QA > notice if one of the do* functions fail. It turns out that there's > already a bug for this [1]. This potentially applies to all helper > functions that don't currently die on failure. >
That's indeed a good idea, and we can do a step further. We can define a new EAPI which makes all do* functions die on error, and provide non-fatal versions as trydo* where it makes it sense. emake could also die since we currently add die calls for all emake occurences. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [email protected] mailing list
