* Arun Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Hi,
> We were just discussing if it makes sense to either die or issue a QA > notice if one of the do* functions fail. It turns out that there's > already a bug for this [1]. This potentially applies to all helper > functions that don't currently die on failure. I'd like to see it this way: introduce a new FEATURE (eg. "hard-qa"), which causes QA warnings to fail. Then evryone's free to enable it. Maintainers always should run their tests with hard-qa, unless there's are *really* good reason. IMHO, this wouldn't harm any users who don't insist in it. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- [email protected] mailing list
