Hi, I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case, should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be "templatized" like most licenses ?
Thanks, Mounir
