-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mounir Lamouri wrote: > Hi, > > I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug > #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see > http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project > (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under > GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as > another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case, > should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be > "templatized" like most licenses ? > > Thanks, > Mounir >
That paste is gone/expired. Marijn - -- Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel. Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmixHYACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wURgCff8WSLE9PHXfO/HI+GdrE1W3J 0/kAoLpB4oFEwOx5Dk+ceo70vCueZgbk =hKRC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
