Mounir Lamouri wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
<hk...@gentoo.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
Hi,
I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
#258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see
http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project
(and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under
GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as
another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case,
should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be
"templatized" like most licenses ?
Thanks,
Mounir
That paste is gone/expired.
I attached it to this email.
Mounir
bump. Can anyone help out here? Is it a license or a doc?
http://dev.gentoo.org/~darkside/tmp/p2pnat_license.txt
thx.
