-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne neděle 22 Březen 2009 17:50:26 Alin Năstac napsal(a):
>> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
>> versions than ${PV}.
>> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alin
> Hi,
> I was working on patches glep [1] (nothing final and it is highly in progress
> but as i can see more pple is interested so i am throwing it to the space so
> there might be somebody else whom might help me with it).
I think the discussion made it clear that people want to do things differently
and there is no reason that we should not allow different teams to follow
different conventions.
Furthermore a lot of our patches are in the sed format and I happen to think
that's a good thing.
Unless your GLEP is prepared to handle these issues it seems completely useless
to me.
Marijn
- --
Gods do not want you to think, lest they lose existence.
Religions do not want you to think, lest they lose power.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknIw14ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2xTIwCfVJG03ysDRv2iCOWY/F0RFCTA
jBcAn06ku3nBjK/LKdMlg8Jc+48Dh+RU
=VqBN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
