On Sat, 16 May 2009 11:34:14 -0400 Richard Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Had we gone with any of the other proposals a year ago, we'd be > > waiting a year every time a new change came along. > > Only if that change prevented obtaining EAPI from wherever it was > placed.
...or if you want version format changes. > > If the Council were not a fan of GLEP 55, they would have voted > > against it. > > Why? If there is no reason to move forward with haste why not just > leave it out there and see if somebody comes up with a better idea or > see if circumstances change? If the perception was that there were a > pressing need for forward movement on this chances are that somebody > would have proposed an alternative GLEP and the council would have > just approved that instead. Three out of six Council members considered GLEP 55 to be necessary enough to vote yes on it the last time it was put to a vote... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
