-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:47:37 +0100 Tomáš Chvátal <scarab...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Removing eclass functions like this is not allowed by current > >> policy. If you want to do it, you should discuss about changing > >> policy. > > > > since when? > > > Since ever. > If you change eclass abi you need to rename it.
No, that's not been the case 'since ever' at all. It used to be that if you changed or removed a function, you just had to make sure you didn't break anything. This was made more complicated by the way that eclasses in the tree were used for removing installed packages too, which is no longer an issue. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuOWnAACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHcgACgj8hDz+sIgvCbqXeotvUqHyYr v2wAoJzESPARQnPDaWhrbFNiK0zHp2G2 =RzSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
