On 04/03/10 16:36, Ben de Groot wrote: > This also raises the question of license. Our current documentation > mostly uses the CC-BY-SA license, while the unoffical wiki adds a > non-commercial restriction. By choosing one license over the other > we will make copy-pasting content from the source that has the other > license, as far as I can see, illegal. I would say that interchange > possibilities with our existing official documentation has priority.
Good point. I agree that a restriction against commercial usage does not work for us. Sebastian
