On 04/12/2010 02:20 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:13:41 +0200
> Christian Faulhammer <fa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org>:
>>> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it
>>> just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
>>> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
>>> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21
>>> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract
>>> says: "We will not hide problems"
>>  Kill REMIND and LATER, introduce Later keyword or ASSIGNED LATER.
> "Me too."©
> What happens to bugs already in that state though?

I would imagine they could be kept in the db as it is but just remove
the options from the UI.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to