Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org>:
> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it
> just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21
> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract
> says: "We will not hide problems"

 Kill REMIND and LATER, introduce Later keyword or ASSIGNED LATER.


Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to