On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 06:16:30AM -0700, Brian Harring wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:26:46PM +0200, Tommmmm Chvvvtal wrote: > > Hi, > > since I am this meetings girl for everything here is first pass on our > > agenda. > > > > I am adding this mail only to g-dev and g-dev-announce to see if > > everyone notice, sorry if it slip your radar. Also if you have something > > to say on this mail please reply to gentoo-dev, or you will render me > > quite sad about thread breaking. > > > > Without much ado here goes THE PLAN: > > > > 1) allow all members to show up (5 min) > > 2) voting > > 2a) we have nothing to vote this time, nobody wanted anything YAY :) > > 3) discussion > > 3a) from last council meeting: the mailing list situation > > 3b) from last council meeting: eclass API changes > > 3c) EAPI 4 status (jmbsvicetto nominate this so we actualy do something new) > > 4) Bugs assigned to council@ in bugzilla and their progress > > 5) select the chair for following meeting > > 6) open floor: community/developers can smash us here :) > > Z) buy some cookies (30 min) > > I suspect we may not wind up being able to get to it in the coming > meeting, but I'd like g55 sorted. > > Specifically, if the authors of it (cc'd) want it to move forward, > request the council vote on it. If you don't want it voted on, mark > it moribund. > > The purpose behind this is to put to end this discussion rather than > having it flare up and make a mess every few months. > > Simply put, it's nothing but divisive noise at this point with no real > new technical discourse occuring- meaning it's realistically time for > a decision (either push it to a vote or put it to bed).
Regardless of my personal opinions about the technical issues on this glep, I agree with the above statement. I am personally tired of seeing the discussion flare up every few months and go nowhere. William
pgp98wTIaUPKl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
