On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 03:05:34 -0700 > Brian Harring <[email protected]> wrote: >> A tie, with a decision to revisit next meeting- the next meeting it >> was decided that yes, g55 is addressing what can be considered a real >> issue. And in the 14 months since then, no one has requested it be >> voted on, or revisited. > > Uh, it *was* requested for a vote, and the Council decided instead to > vote on something else and not upon what was asked. >
So you ask again in the next meeting. And if it happens again, you file a protest. If it still happens, write a GLEP to prevent issues from being deferred indefinitely. Do I really need to give you ideas on how to stubbornly push proposals through? > If you want to try to get the Council to commit to something, feel > free. But asking the Council to vote on it hasn't worked so far, and > there comes a point where asking the same thing over and over again > becomes rude and counterproductive. > There also comes a time when repeatedly bringing up a GLEP that you have no interest in getting approved becomes rude and counterproductive. > It's extremely misleading of you to claim that it's the responsibility > of the GLEP 55 authors to push it to the Council at this point. That > was already tried several times, and got nowhere. > It is excessively misleading of you to claim that Brian said that the GLEP 55 *authors* should push it to the Council. Nice strawman. He made a simple statement: The people who want the GLEP should either put it up for vote and settle it's status, or stop wasting everyone's time and let it die. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
