On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 03:05:34 -0700 Brian Harring <[email protected]> wrote: > > GLEP 55 *was* put up for a vote, along with GLEP 54, on 20090514. > > GLEP 54 was accepted subject to GLEP 55 being approved. The vote on > > GLEP 55 was a tie. > > A tie, with a decision to revisit next meeting- the next meeting it > was decided that yes, g55 is addressing what can be considered a real > issue. And in the 14 months since then, no one has requested it be > voted on, or revisited.
Uh, it *was* requested for a vote, and the Council decided instead to vote on something else and not upon what was asked. If you want to try to get the Council to commit to something, feel free. But asking the Council to vote on it hasn't worked so far, and there comes a point where asking the same thing over and over again becomes rude and counterproductive. It's extremely misleading of you to claim that it's the responsibility of the GLEP 55 authors to push it to the Council at this point. That was already tried several times, and got nowhere. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
