I was just looking at some random ebuilds recently, and noticed this
snippet in gcc-4.5* ebuilds:

SSP_STABLE="amd64 x86 ppc ppc64 arm
# uclibc need tls and nptl support for SSP support"
SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE=""

Please note how the #-starting comment is inside the SSP_STABLE variable
declaration. It looks very obvious when seen in a syntax-coloring editor.

I'm not sure if it breaks, as "uclibc", "need", "tls" etc. are not valid
arch names, but it's still probably not intended.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to