On 10/05/2010 02:32 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I was just looking at some random ebuilds recently, and noticed this > snippet in gcc-4.5* ebuilds: > > SSP_STABLE="amd64 x86 ppc ppc64 arm > # uclibc need tls and nptl support for SSP support" > SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE="" > > Please note how the #-starting comment is inside the SSP_STABLE variable > declaration. It looks very obvious when seen in a syntax-coloring editor. > > I'm not sure if it breaks, as "uclibc", "need", "tls" etc. are not valid > arch names, but it's still probably not intended. >
Open a bug? Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
