On Tuesday 05 October 2010 18.52.29 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 02:32 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > I was just looking at some random ebuilds recently, and noticed this
> > snippet in gcc-4.5* ebuilds:
> >
> > SSP_STABLE="amd64 x86 ppc ppc64 arm
> > # uclibc need tls and nptl support for SSP support"
> > SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE=""
> >
> > Please note how the #-starting comment is inside the SSP_STABLE variable
> > declaration. It looks very obvious when seen in a syntax-coloring editor.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it breaks, as "uclibc", "need", "tls" etc. are not valid
> > arch names, but it's still probably not intended.
>
> Open a bug?
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
allready fixed in cvs and it was not intended.
/Magnus
