On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos
<pchr...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 11:20 Mon 15 Nov     , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>>  I don't want to stop you, but you are relatively new to the "real"
>> keywording business.  amd64 at a point had over 30 members and could
>> not work on the backlog in a timely manner.  Think about
>> ...
> I completely agree. I don't know even what's the status of ~mips in the
> main tree. It would be better, I believe, to start working on the ~mips
> system/world set, then start stabilizing only toolchain and/or
> @base-system packages. Please don't start keywording/stabilizing random
> packages without taking into *serious* consideration what Christian
> wrote. I was here when we dropped the stable mips keyword, I don't want
> to see it happening again.

I'm not planning an ad-hoc at-random stabilization/keywording spree.

I'd just like to have a stable and tested base system.

Reply via email to