On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:59:22 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 07-03-2011 16:52:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > > In any case, I don't see poor browser design as a valid reason for > > avoiding the use of SSL... > > Please use a MUA that properly honours Reply-To: headers. I'm on the > list.
subscribed != receiving. there's no way of knowing who is. get over it. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
