-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:59:49 -0400 Dane Smith <c1p...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Having said that, for those that just use "keys" for e-mails (most of > us), it would make more sense to use full blow SSL certs in the long > run. (Mathematically, same thing. But a cert needs to be signed by a > CA, and we should ideally maintain a Gentoo CA.) I need to get up to > speed with the GLEP's pertaining to this. Let's just say I have a > fair bit of experience in this field. I may be able to offer some > ideas / suggestions. I would very much like to see this happen. How about Gentoo Foundation funding devs a full blown X509 client certs? - -- Best regards, Michał Górny -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2MqicACgkQnGSe5QXeB7uMJwCfZ2vnDNdN1HyI9Jzcz9ddPnHO EBwAni9LaXlGcyCp8Hj/MtD0VVSdQoRj =dtD+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
