On Monday, June 13, 2011 19:09:06 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On 11-06-2011 20:48, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 16:24:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>>> So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect > >>>> him. I'm not at all implying that Diego would abuse his position, > >>>> but still I think that this is not a sane situation. > >>> > >>> it does seem trivial to remove people who disagree with you and thus > >>> cement an echo chamber > >> > >> Are you talking in a hypothetical future situation, or has this already > >> happened? If so, can you point to an example of where Diego's been > >> removing people for disagreeing with him, rather than for disagreeing > >> with the Council? > > > > how is disagreeing with a Council decision valid grounds either ? > > punting people because they disagree with any group isn't really valid. > > It was not about disagreeing with Council but actively going against an > approved policy when the team is responsible for enforcing policies in > the tree. > > This is why in my proposal for the review of GLEP 48 I added a point > stating that acting against established policies would constitute ground > to be removed from the team.
that isnt what Ciaran said, and what you describe no one has shown me doing. thus the only logical conclusions that one can draw from this: - Diego mistakenly removed me without knowing all the facts or - i was removed for purely voicing disagreement -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
