On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:26:56 -0700
Brian Harring <ferri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aka, ebuild's should be written to assume the files they install get 
> wiped; there is *zero* mention of mtime, nor could any ebuild rely on 
> it and be compliant.

But as it's a FEATURE, they can't assume that at all.

So either we spec VDB and the unmerge process, which gets horrible for
all kinds of reasons, or ebuilds can't assume that things that have
been modified get wiped.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to