On Wednesday 19 October 2011 14:53:07 Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:05:50PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i wrote a new func for toolchain.eclass: huse.  this is because the
> > toolchain.eclass supports multiple versions in parallel, and the IUSE
> > value can vary greatly between them.  so doing `use foo` without
> > checking IUSE first doesn't work.  since i got a request to use this in
> > other eclasses (for the same reason), i figured i'd move it to
> > eutils.eclass so more people can benefit.
> > 
> > now that we have "in_iuse" in eutils.eclass (with all the caveats), i'll
> > be
> > 
> > adding huse:
> >     huse() {
> >     
> >             in_iuse $1 || return 1
> >             use $1
> >     
> >     }
> > 
> > any comments before i publish ?
> 
> Call it safe_use.

safe for who ?  that implies to me much more vagueness than "iuse" ...
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to