On 9 March 2012 17:31, Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: > At any rate, I'm now convinced that we all want GLEP 55, but with a > different name.
I think that moving the data to the filename is probably a better approach than semi- or repeat parsing, but I prefer preserving the .ebuild extension, and think that eapi should be specified similarly to ebuild revision, as a suffix. for instance: app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1.ebuild # EAPI0 (or the highest EAPI prior to the new schema) app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1-e1.ebuild app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1-e99.ebuild
