>>>>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Here is my interpretation: the council voted on the following > question:
> <ulm> The question is: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a > supported configuration." > It did not decide the method that would be used to accomplish this. > A few council members (Chainsaw mainly) expressed a desire to do it > without an initramfs, but an official stance on this was not put > forward. > You are reading into it more that you should. Please don't cite single lines without context. My next line in that log is: <ulm> as in the agenda Which says: | 3. New udev and separate /usr partition (30 minutes) | | See [4]: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported | configuration. If it is, newer udev can not be stabled and | alternatives should be investigated. If it isn't, a lot of | documentation will have to be updated. (And an alternative should | likely still be provided.)" | | [4] <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_c96d1b724cd736702820fa5ff1547557.xml> Ulrich
